Jewish Reconstructionist Federation

It’s very kind of you to share such an interesting point of view. King Size Bed Dimensions It's such a terrific post, that I've forwarded it to my friends!

Denver Co Locksmith Locksmith Charlotte Nc Locksmith in Charlotte Nc  

we got the coolest products at

buffalo ny apron

shalom and God be with us all

buffalo yoga class

Normal 0 7.8 ? 0 2 false false false EN-US ZH-CN X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:????; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.5pt; mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-font-kerning:1.0pt;} Thank you for sharing articles, <a href=" http://www.canadagooseoutlets.org/ "> canada goose outlet </a> support you forever !

thank alot for share, this article realy great Meriahkan pesta ulang tahun bersama GarudaFood

really worth to read it. i am speechless on this issue.

spying cell phones

spent some time browsing forums about hacking android,.. and now I know, that it won't run on mips Data Safes

Zip Repair

Thanks for your information

Excellent content ...

mesothelioma

Another great example of innovation, I am glad to find it. There are so many developers working on this segment but this is one of the best innovative idea ever. Thanks for sharing it here. gun safes houston

Very well put, Eric. And thanks for pointing out that "our version" of "zot hatorah" is grounded firmly in traditional liturgy (from this part of the service, that is), which I had not realized. skin care for women

Kaplan was a devout Zionist and preached Jewish nationalism.  Yet he was adamant about eliminating the concept of chosenness from our liturgy -- even though he understood that this concept could indeed be transvalued.  He believed that to transvalue this concept rather than eliminate it would be unwise.  Precisely because he advocated Zionism, he knew that it would be risky and unwise to combine 20th century nationalism with traditional beliefs of "chosenness".  He was a universalist.  A parochial nationalism tainted with popular beliefs about being chosen or better than others was unacceptable.  And so he was unyielding about removing references to chosenness from our liturgy. government jobs

Kaplan founded ways of reinterpreting and our traditions. Certainly, for most of the causes he chooses reinterpreting and "transvaluing" our traditional ideas, myths and rituals.

Midrash I: God offered the torah to all other peoples and each of them were prepared to accept part but not all until He (sic) came to B'nai Israel who said we will hear and we will do.
Midrash II: God took the whole mountain and turned it upside down over B'nai Israel and said if you don't accept the Torah I will drop this mountain on your head.(i.e. the Holocaust and the exile are the mountain dropped on our heads)
Midrash III: We were all together at Sinai and not only do I remember being there but I also remember who stood next to me. In other words local units make up the peoplehood of Israel and unite us in our peoplehood.

When you see something that is technically sweet, you go ahead and do it and you'll argue about what to do about it only after you've have had your technical success. That is the way it was with the atomic bomb.

J. Robert Oppenheimer.

Kaplan pioneered ways of reinterpreting and "transvaluing" our traditions.  Indeed, for many reasons he preferred reinterpreting and "transvaluing" our traditional beliefs and myths and rituals.  All the more reason for us to pay attention to those instances in which he advocated outright rejection of past beliefs!

Kaplan was clear that our tradition treated women as inferior to men -- and not merely as "different".  He uttlerly rejected these beliefs, practices, and rituals and exhorted us to create an egalitarian Jewish community.  He was willing to accede to popular pressure to change a little slower than he preferred -- but not as slowly as most of his followers wanted.  He was unwilling, however, to compromise on the goal of an egalitarian community and he was unwilling to give a positive spin to those parts of our tradition that were misceganist and sexist.

Kaplan was a devout Zionist and preached Jewish nationalism.  Yet he was adamant about eliminating the concept of chosenness from our liturgy -- even though he understood that this concept could indeed be transvalued.  He believed that to transvalue this concept rather than eliminate it would be unwise.  Precisely because he advocated Zionism, he knew that it would be risky and unwise to combine 20th century nationalism with traditional beliefs of "chosenness".  He was a universalist.  A parochial nationalism tainted with popular beliefs about being chosen or better than others was unacceptable.  And so he was unyielding about removing references to chosenness from our liturgy.

Similarly, Kaplan rejected the traditional concept of the Torah being revealed to Moses on Sinai (and the derivative belief that what was not revealed to Moses on Sinai was revealed to Rabbi Akiva).  First, it is bad theology.  We don't believe in a God that acts in this way, a God that reveals The Truth for All Time to a single individual and to be the property of a single people.  Secondly, the holiness of the Torah comes from the same source as the holiness of any other text.  The Torah is holy because the Jewish people have made it holy.  (Other peoples also have similar texts that they have made holy.)  But most importantly for Kaplan, this belief is fundamentally unethical and incompatible with living in multiple civilizations.  And here is the essence of one of the most radical elements of Kaplan's thought.  Unlike his former colleaqgues in Young Israel and unlike his colleagues at JTS, Kaplan valued living in multiple civilizations.  Living in a multicultural society was not just something that he was willing to accept as necessary.  Even his view of Jewish civilization in Israel was a vision of a Jewish community living in a multicultural society.  Eretz Israel was to be the place where Jewish civilization would be the primary civilization -- but not the only civilization!  The traditional doctrine of literal and direct revelation by God to Moses of The Truth in the form of The Torah on Mt. Sinai is unethical.  It essentially rejects the concept of a universal God because it maintains that God gave The Truth to one person on behalf of a single people.  And it is incompatible with tolerance and to valuing living in multiple civilizations.  And, like the concept of chosenness, it was, in Kaplan's view, a very dangerous doctrine for a people to maintain at a time of developing a nationalist movement.  Kaplan was right doctrinally.  And, unfortunately, he was right about the dangers such a doctrine posed to Zionism and the future of Jewish civilization.